🩸 BloodHound Scan Progress Report

3-Month Trend Analysis • EXAR vs Hunt Comparison • July - September 2026
Success Rate Growth
â–² 6.8%
59.2% → 66.0%
Sep 13 to Sep 20
Scan Results (Sep 20)
33 / 16 / 1
Success: 66.0% • Failure: 32.0% • In Progress: 2.0%
Total: 50 scans
EXAR vs Hunt (Sep 20)
75.0% vs 63.2%
EXAR: 9/12 • Hunt: 24/38
Performance gap: 11.8%

Monthly Scan Status Breakdown

Success vs Failure Count by Month
18
22
Jul 5
41
43.9%
22
18
Aug 8
43
51.2%
29
19
Sep 13
49
59.2%
33
16
Sep 20
50
66.0%
Successful
Failed
EXAR Domain Scan Failures by Customer
paschoalotto
2
cemex
2
grupo-ccr-br
1

Scan Trend Analysis

Successful Scans        Failed Scans
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Jul 5
Aug 8
Sep 13
Sep 20
Success Rate: EXAR vs Hunt
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Jul 5
Aug 8
Sep 13
Sep 20
EXAR (75.0% latest)
Hunt (63.2% latest)

Failed Scan Error Analysis (Latest Report)

Error Distribution (16 Failed Scans)
Click a slice to see customer details →

Customer Type Domain Owner Ticket ID Slack Link Error Message
💡 Key Insights
✓ Success rate improved by 6.8pp (Sep 13→Sep 20) showing improving improvement
✓ Successful scans increased by 15 scans (+83.3%) overall (18 → 33 scans)
✓ Total scan volume increased by 9 scans (+22.0%) (41 → 50 scans)
✓ Failed scans reduced by 6 scans despite increased total volume
✓ EXAR customers show 13.1% higher success rate on average (65.0% vs 51.9%)
✓ Sep 20 showed strongest performance: 75.0% EXAR vs 63.2% Hunt (11.8% gap)

Monthly Performance Breakdown

Month Total Scans Successful Failed Success Rate EXAR Success Rate Hunt Success Rate
Jul 5 41 18 22 43.9% 60.0% (6/10) 38.7% (12/31)
Aug 8 43 22 18 51.2% 50.0% (6/12) 51.6% (16/31)
Sep 13 49 29 19 59.2% 75.0% (9/12) 54.1% (20/37)
Sep 20 50 33 16 66.0% 75.0% (9/12) 63.2% (24/38)